One day final week, with her workforce, the Connecticut Sun, in a first-round playoff collection towards WNBA star Caitlin Clark’s Indiana Fever, guard DiJonai Carrington was surrounded by a bunch of reporters. Carrington had swatted Clark within the face whereas reaching for the ball within the earlier recreation, leaving her with a black eye.
USA Today columnist Christine Brennan had a query: Did you try this on function?
No, Carrington stated.
Brennan adopted up: Were you laughing about it later within the recreation?
“I just told you I didn’t even know I hit her,” Carrington stated.
The alternate got here at an exhilarating however tense second for the league, which has lengthy been powered by ladies of colour however has seen its current success largely attributed to Clark. The consideration on the league has by no means been larger, however gamers throughout the collection have been topic to upticks in on-line harassment, and safety was added at Connecticut’s house area.
It was with this backdrop that the questions didn’t sit properly within the Connecticut locker room, and some minutes later, the Sun’s DeWanna Bonner confronted Brennan.
Brennan repeatedly tried to introduce herself and clarify what she stated as Bonner implored the columnist to deal with her teammates like people. After practically two minutes of principally speaking previous one another, Bonner returned to the locker room. (Brennan confirmed the confrontation to The Washington Post.)
Brennan, who's engaged on a guide about Clark and routinely seems on TV, approached the opposite reporters and remarked that one thing like that wouldn’t occur within the NFL. She requested why the WNBA was so delicate and advised a number of reporters that if anybody had questions on her consciousness of the racial dynamics at play, they need to learn her protection of former NFL quarterback and activist Colin Kaepernick, amongst different work stretching again many years. (Brennan is White; Carrington is Black.)
Three days later, the Women’s National Basketball Players Association issued an announcement calling for the league to revoke the credential of Brennan, one of the vital recognizable sports activities journalists within the nation.
“To unprofessional members of the media like Christine Brennan: You are not fooling anyone. That so-called interview in the name of journalism was a blatant attempt to bait a professional athlete into participating into a narrative that is false and designed to fuel racist, homophobic, and misogynistic vitriol on social media. You cannot hide behind your tenure,” the assertion learn. It added: “You have abused your privileges and do not deserve the credentials issued to you.”
Brennan, in an interview, known as her questions “journalism 101.”
“It’s something that I have done in the entirety of my career,” she stated, “and I think every other journalist has done the entirety of his or her career.”
Other journalists, together with her boss at USA Today, agreed.
“We reject the notion that the interview perpetuated any narrative other than to get the player’s perspective directly,” USA Today government sports activities editor Roxanna Scott stated in an announcement.
But the saga has nonetheless turn into a serious storyline of the WNBA playoffs, at a time when Clark’s enduring stardom and the league’s unprecedented development are testing the league’s relationship with the media.
“When I saw the video [of the questions to Carrington], my heart dropped,” Terri Jackson, the chief director of the gamers union, stated in an interview. “I was so upset because we already have people looking to attack these players. We’re talking about being safe at work.”
A WNBA spokesman didn't reply to a request for remark. Neither did Scott.
Brennan, 66, is a pioneer in sports activities journalism. She was the primary president of the Association for Women in Sports Media within the Eighties (when she labored for The Washington Post). She remembers going to her editors and asking why the paper didn’t cowl the foremost ladies’s golf tournaments or the ladies’s Final Four – and promptly obtained a few of these assignments.
“I cannot tell you the number of times my male colleagues – and some of them dear friends – have teased me or ridiculed me for my coverage of women’s sports,” she stated.
Brennan stated her upcoming guide, “On Her Game: Caitlin Clark and the Revolution in Women’s Sports,” is “unauthorized” and that she has not completed a sit-down interview with Clark. It’s anticipated to be printed subsequent season. Its scope goes past Clark, however she is its driving drive.
Clark helped the league safe an enormous enhance in its new broadcast offers and her video games have set attendance data and pushed TV scores spikes. Fox Sports government Mike Mulvihill posted on social media not too long ago that the viewers for Clark’s nationwide TV video games throughout the common season averaged 1.178 million however was 394,000 for all others.
Still, some reporters and league stakeholders have bristled at what they see because the narrowness of Brennan’s protection, which has centered virtually completely on Clark. Reporters pointed to an April column by which Brennan requested why gamers are “frosty” towards Clark. And she was deeply important in tales, on TV and on social media about Clark being left off the U.S. Olympic workforce.
Brennan wrote one other piece from the Olympics after the U.S. workforce superior to the gold medal recreation, headlined: “US women’s basketball should draw huge Paris crowds but isn’t. Team needed Caitlin Clark.” The introduced attendance was 11,919, solely round 300 fewer followers than the U.S. males’s semifinal comeback victory towards Serbia the day earlier than.
Brennan stated she didn't write the headline and agreed it was deceptive. She stated the column itself highlighted the shortage of media consideration and VIPs on the recreation, including: “The whole point of saying Caitlin Clark should have been on the team was to bring eyeballs that this team so deserves that it just never gets.”
“Her coverage has gone way beyond what is normal,” stated Gregory Lee Jr., a former editor on the Athletic and professor at Loyola University New Orleans, who stated he wouldn’t communicate with Brennan for her guide although she reached out. “The way she’s covering Caitlin Clark, you’re asking, ‘Is she Caitlin Clark’s PR agent?’” (Lee is a former editor at The Post.)
Added Terrika Foster-Brasby, the sideline reporter for the Connecticut Sun: “I think it’s wonderful she wants to write a book on Caitlin Clark, but I do think it’s a gross misuse to use those media availabilities to gather content for your book and make players uncomfortable.”
She continued: “It’s disheartening for those other athletes who have wanted an opportunity to have media coverage and you’re taking the opportunity to speak with them but never ask anything about them.”
Brennan stated she has spoken to quite a few gamers about matters that ranged far past Clark.
Jackson, the president of the WNBA gamers affiliation, spoke to Brennan this summer time. She stated she left the dialog troubled.
“It was exhausting,” Jackson stated. “I said this season wasn’t a flip of the switch. We had the covid bubble season, other periods. I’ve been here nine years, and I said, ‘You are doing a disservice to the history [by focusing only on Caitlin].’”
Brennan stated she was shocked the interview with Jackson may be misconstrued as something apart from a reporter on the lookout for data.
“When you cover a sport, you write about the big story,” Brennan stated. “Over the years covering golf, I wrote probably over 100 columns on Tiger Woods and ignored almost all the other golfers.”
The WNBA has lengthy had a fraught relationship with reporters. Last yr, a number of New York Liberty gamers have been fined for not speaking with reporters after the Finals, and the league has shut off reporters’ entry to locker rooms. Legacy media and newspapers have usually made protection of the league an afterthought.
But that's altering. With Clark main the headlines, speaking heads and lots of former NBA gamers have spent this season discussing the league at size, with a lot of those self same folks telling WNBA gamers to be grateful for Clark. Several reporters who cowl the WNBA stated there stays rigidity each time reporters ask about Clark, at the same time as Clark continues to drive curiosity in and income for the league.
After Brennan’s questions to Carrington final week, Jackson stated she spoke with management within the gamers union and there was widespread settlement that they wanted to reply.
But when the union ventured into the territory of questioning Brennan’s credentials, the story morphed from a referendum on a high-profile columnist’s reporting to whether or not she ought to be allowed to try this reporting in any respect. Several reporters across the league known as it a blatant overreaction.
“The WNBA and its players keep fumbling their golden opportunity with a string of ill-advised decisions and PR gaffes exposing them as not being ready for prime time,” wrote Boston Globe columnist Tara Sullivan.
Michael Rosenberg, a Sports Illustrated columnist who has coated the WNBA, stated in an interview: “Decline to answer someone’s questions, complain to them privately, or rip them publicly. That’s all fair. But I think credentials should only be pulled for clear violations of professional ethics.”
The critique of Brennan’s questions was rooted much less within the questions themselves than within the local weather by which they have been requested.
Carrington has been the topic of intense social media harassment. She posted a screenshot of an e-mail she obtained by which she was known as a racial slur and threatened with sexual violence. Someone else posted an image of a police officer kneeling on George Floyd’s neck with an image of Carrington superimposed over Floyd’s face and Clark’s superimposed on the officer’s.
According to a report in Andscape, the gang in Connecticut throughout the playoff collection was trafficking in racially coded trash discuss, too. One fan’s shirt learn “Ban Nails,” and one fan shouted at Carrington when she fell, “What, did you trip on your eyelashes?”
“In my 11-year career I never experienced the racial comments like from the Indiana Fever fan base,” Sun ahead Alyssa Thomas stated after the collection.
“We certainly know that there are many people who are racist who attack Black people on Twitter,” Brennan stated. “That is a fact. It is horrible. … In the case of asking the follow-up I did, it was giving … DiJonai Carrington the chance to address an issue that was already on Twitter and being discussed by, what? Tens of thousands of people? Hundreds of thousands? Millions of people?”
Brennan stated USA Today is planning to request a credential so she will cowl the WNBA Finals.
Related Content
Meet the United Auto Workers members who could swing the election
