New DNA analysis disproves theory that Kaspar Hauser was a lost prince | Analysis

Sign up for CNN’s Wonder Theory science publication. Explore the universe with information on fascinating discoveries, scientific developments and extra.

CNN
 — 

“His birth was unknown, his death hidden.”

So reads the gravestone (translated from Latin) marking the grave of the enigmatic man often called Kaspar Hauser, who died in 1833. Nearly 200 years later, scientists have lastly solved a longstanding thriller about Hauser’s suspected ties to German royalty.

Hauser appeared seemingly out of nowhere in what's now Nuremberg, Germany, on May 26, 1828, when he was about 16 years previous. He was discovered wandering the city sq. with no identification and with an unsigned letter clutched in his hand.

The letter and Hauser’s fragmented recollections informed a harrowing story: that he grew up in a cramped dungeon that he by no means left and was fed and stored clear by a benefactor whom he by no means noticed. When the teenage Hauser turned up within the city middle, he might barely write his personal identify and was scarcely in a position to talk with officers who questioned him.

A unbelievable story took root, suggesting that Hauser was a kidnapped prince of native lore, taken from the royal household of Baden, then a sovereign state in what’s now southwest Germany. There was no proof to assist this theory, however the rumors continued, endearing Hauser to trendy members of European society and establishing him as a native movie star.

Long after Hauser’s loss of life, students searched in useless for any proof of regal parentage. In the mid-Nineties, genetic knowledge from samples of Hauser’s preserved blood urged that he was not a part of the Baden lineage. But these outcomes had been quickly contradicted by assessments a few years later that sampled Hauser’s hair.

Recently, scientists discovered definitive solutions by new analysis of hair samples from Hauser, based on analysis revealed within the journal iScience. Their strategy, developed for historic fragments of DNA from Neanderthals, was extra delicate than earlier strategies.

When they analyzed Hauser’s mitochondrial DNA, or mtDNA — genetic code handed down on the maternal aspect — they confirmed that it didn’t match mtDNA from Baden members of the family. Nearly two centuries after Hauser’s mysterious look, this discovering dominated out the chance that he was a kidnapped prince.

The new analysis “exemplifies how molecular genetics can unravel historical mysteries,” mentioned Dr. Dmitry Temiakov, a professor within the division of biochemistry and molecular biology at Thomas Jefferson University in Philadelphia.

“This is a very comprehensive study,” mentioned Temiakov, who was not concerned within the analysis. “(It) accounted for all previous data, examined and explained the discrepancies in DNA sequencing analyses that took place at different times and were performed by different methods, presented new data, and carefully estimated the probability of an individual matching a particular lineage.”

The lab that performed the brand new analysis has labored for practically twenty years to enhance strategies for finding out extremely degraded DNA, mentioned lead research creator and forensic molecular biologist Dr. Walther Parson, a researcher on the National DNA Database Laboratory of the Austrian Federal Ministry of the Interior in Innsbruck, Austria.

For their research, the scientists first reviewed earlier findings about Hauser. In 1996, a lab in Munich, Germany, analyzed blood from Hauser’s underwear. (He died of a knife wound, and his bloodstained garments are preserved in a museum in Ansbach, Germany.) According to the Munich lab, mtDNA in Hauser’s blood didn’t match Baden mtDNA. However, some researchers who supported the “lost prince” speculation claimed that the blood could not have belonged to Hauser, Parson informed CNN.

“It has been said that the curators of the museum where the trousers of Kaspar Hauser were put on display, that they would renew the bloodstain in order to make it look better,” including recent blood from a totally different supply, he mentioned. “If that was the case, the new blood would mask the old blood and would very likely have different mitochondrial DNA.”

In the early 2000s, one other lab in Münster, Germany, examined hair samples from Hauser. Those outcomes confirmed that Hauser’s mtDNA was a shut match to that of the Badens, contradicting the findings from Munich.

“They were in a stalemate,” Parson mentioned.

Parson’s lab performed new analysis of Hauser’s hair, utilizing strands collected earlier than and after his loss of life. The hairs had been documented extensively and might be authenticated with extra certainty than the blood samples, Parson mentioned. What’s extra, the lab’s extremely delicate approach enabled researchers to make certain that they had been sampling the hair shafts, the place the helpful mtDNA was situated, and that the samples weren’t contaminated.

“With the improved sequencing method, we were able to get sequences of the highly degraded component,” delivering outcomes with a a lot stronger sign than within the earlier hair analysis, Parson mentioned. The new outcomes matched these of the blood analysis from 1996, discovering that Hauser’s mitotype — a set of mitochondrial alleles for various genes — was kind W. The mitotype of the Badens was kind H.

“That changes the picture, because now the hair samples give the same result as the blood sample,” Parson mentioned.

To verify their outcomes, the researchers despatched hair strands to a third lab — in Potsdam, Germany — that specialised in historic DNA however didn't inform scientists there that the pattern was Hauser’s hair. The Potsdam blind analysis additionally returned the sort W mitotype for the Hauser pattern.

“The consistency of data across three independent laboratories further reinforces the study’s conclusions,” Temiakov added.

According to the “prince theory,” Hauser’s dad and mom had been the Grand Duke Carl and Grand Duchess Stéphanie de Beauharnais. The grand duchess gave delivery to a son on September 29, 1812, and the unnamed youngster died when he was 18 days previous.

However, some whispered that the deceased toddler was one other child, swapped for the 2-week-old prince by his step-grandmother, Countess Louise Caroline von Hochberg. The theory goes that the true prince — the person who later known as himself Kaspar Hauser — was then hidden away. When Carl and Stéphanie subsequently failed to provide a male inheritor, one in all Countess Hochberg’s sons ascended the grand ducal throne.

The new findings about Hauser not solely debunk the prince theory; additionally they show the significance of pushing the bounds of applied sciences for DNA analysis, Parson mentioned. “That, of course, has an impact on how we continue to work on mitochondrial DNA in human identification cases in forensics,” he added.

But if Hauser wasn’t a “lost prince,” who was he? It’s not possible to inform from the mtDNA proof, which might solely affiliate him with a Western European lineage, based on the research.

In the Ansbach cemetery the place Hauser is buried, his tombstone describes him as “the riddle of his time.” Whoever Hauser was, nevertheless, is a riddle that is but to be solved.

Mindy Weisberger is a science author and media producer whose work has appeared in Live Science, Scientific American and How It Works journal.