Supreme Court denies Biden administration’s request to require Texas hospitals to provide emergency abortion care | Politics

Date:



CNN
 — 

The Supreme Court on Monday left in place a courtroom order blocking the Biden administration from imposing in Texas its coverage of requiring hospitals to provide emergency abortion care or threat dropping federal funding.

The justices rejected a Justice Department request that they wipe away the lower-court ruling and ship the case again down for extra proceedings. That ruling had struck down steering from the Department of Health and Human Services asserting that, underneath federal legislation, hospitals had been obligated to supply abortion in medical emergencies even in states that ban the process.

The transfer is setback for the Biden administration in its uphill effort to assert some protections for abortion entry for the reason that Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022.

Monday’s maneuver additionally retains abortion off the Supreme Court’s docket – for now – after two main abortion instances final time period, together with one from Idaho elevating very related points because the Texas dispute.

The excessive courtroom’s dealing with of each the Idaho and Texas instances leaves unanswered questions on whether or not, underneath a legislation generally known as the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act, federally-funded hospitals should supply abortions to emergency sufferers with being pregnant issues placing their well being in danger – even in states that ban the process.

Texas, joined by different plaintiffs, efficiently sued to halt Biden administration steering to hospitals asserting that EMTALA trumps state abortion bans. A ruling blocking the administration from imposing the coverage within the Lone Star State was upheld by the fifth US Circuit Court of Appeals.

US Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar had requested the Supreme Court to wipe away that ruling and instruct the decrease courts to rethink the case with newer authorized developments in thoughts.

Last time period, the Supreme Court punted on an analogous case arising out of Idaho, the place the Justice Department sued the state over its strict abortion ban, alleging that the ban violated EMTALA for its lack of exemptions for abortions when being pregnant issues imperil girl’s bodily capabilities however don't but imperil her life.

The Supreme Court paused a decrease courtroom’s order blocking the ban in medical emergencies and took up the case earlier than a full attraction performed out in decrease courts, solely to rule 5-4 this summer time that the case had been taken up prematurely, sending it again to decrease courts.

Share post:

Subscribe

Popular

More like this
Related

Court rules that betting on US congressional elections can temporarily resume | News

ATLANTIC CITY, N.J. -- Betting on the result of...

Melania Trump to Speak Out in Support of Abortion Rights in New Memoir | Politics

Melania Trump made a unprecedented declaration in an eagerly...

Interview with Mondaire Jones on NY-17 race covers Israel, abortion | Politics

Congressional candidate Mondaire Jones talks with lohud reportersMondaire Jones,...

The Implications of Georgia Judge’s Ruling on Abortion Ban | Politics

A Georgia decide struck down the state’s six-week abortion...

Boeing machinists set to lose health care benefits on Tuesday following strike | Health

WASHINGTON — Boeing manufacturing unit staff who're at...

EPA loses lawsuit on fluoride in water in federal court | Lawsuit

A federal court in California dominated late Tuesday in...

Kamala Harris’ worst issue is no longer immigration, thanks to Joe Biden | Immigration

When Kamala Harris grew to become the presumptive Democratic...